Lumafield , a company that score industrial CT and ex - ray skim software and equipment for designers , has afascinating blog postand YouTube telecasting comparing the interior structures of the Apple Vision Pro and Meta ’s Quest 3 and Quest Pro . The catch is that these are n’t your everyday “ take them all aside ” teardowns , but rather comparisons of high - firmness industrial CT scans . You get a good sense , particularly in theYouTube video , of how these ware were arrange and design differently .
Lumafield
The blog Wiley Post breaks down its findings into different areas like innovation , display , sensors , processors , and batteries , but we ’re not really going to learn anything we did n’t already know . The Vision Pro was a intention - forward product with expensive choices like angled circle boards and automatic motorized show adjustment for inter - pupillary distance .
The Vision Pro’s internal layout prioritizes design and features over manufacturing complexity and cost.
Meta ’s headsets are plan to be multitude - manufactured at a low cost , so they make different choices about doing thing that are expensive like motorize optic .
It ’s deserving ten proceedings of your fourth dimension to chink out the blog post andYouTube video(embedded below ) , if for no other reason than to see the slick - take care scan and compare the designing priority of the two companies and how they dissent . If we learned anything , it ’s that there ’s plenty of room for Apple to plan a headset that be a whole band less to manufacture with only a few nonaged compromises to the overall experience .
Apple Vision Pro
The Vision Pro’s internal layout prioritizes design and features over manufacturing complexity and cost.
Even the Vision Pro’s audio pods (left) are more complex internally than the similar hardware on Quest 3 (right).
