Expert’s Rating
Pros
Cons
Our Verdict
Tuesday was avery busy solar day for Appleand we in the Macworld Lab were ecstatic to see the Mac so well constitute . Luckily , we did n’t have to wait long to get our hired man on a new13 - inch MacBook Pro with Retina display .
We tested the $ 1699 standard conformation model , which has a 2.5GHz dual - core Core i5 processor , Intel ’s integrated HD Graphics 4000 , 128 GB of ostentation storage , and 8 GB of RAM . Apple propose a second $ 1999 model that is identical except it has 256 GB of flash storage . The 13 - inch Retina display has a 2560 by 1600 aboriginal pixel settlement .
Apple still sells non - Retina13 - column inch MacBook Prosthat have a1280 by 800screen resolution . The $ 1199 good example has the same 2.5GHz double - core Core i5 processor as the Retina laptop computer and the same integrated graphics , but it has just 4 GB of RAM and a5400 - rpm500 GB hard drive . The $ 1499 non - Retina example has a 2.9GHz dual - heart Core i7 processor , 8 GB of RAM , integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 , and a5400 - rpm750 GB hard thrust .
13-inch Retina MacBook Pro: Speedmark 8 Scores
All solvent are scores . high-pitched score are safe . Best consequence inbold . extension model initalics .
Retina vs. non-Retina
We used our newSpeedmark 8benchmark to guess the performance of the novel 13 - inchRetinaMacBook Pro . It brand a Speedmark 8 score of 184 , while the 13 - inch 2.5GHz non - Retina MacBook Pro ’s score was 121 . If you prove the single app scores for Speedmark 8 ( see the conclusion of this clause ) , you ’ll see that the carrying into action differences were mostly due to the immobile flash memory in the fresh Retina laptop . It read rough 5 times long for the 5400 - rpm grueling drive in the non - Retina laptop computer to complete our file copying and uncompressing tests . As you might await , results in CPU - intensive tests were very standardized . For illustration , the Retina laptop grade a 1.07 in MathematicaMark ; the non - Retina system scored a 1.06 .
The 13 - in non - Retina 2.9GHz MacBook Pro with 8 GB of RAM exit the performance crack considerably , score a 153 in Speedmark 8 . It was quick than the 2.5GHz Retina MacBook Pro in CineBench ’s CPU and GPU trial , the file compression test , Portal 2 , and MathematicaMark . The non - Retina ’s 5400 - revolutions per minute hard drive took 4.5 times as retentive to nail the filing cabinet copy test and uncompress file tests .
13-inch Retina vs. 15-inch Retina
The new 13 - column inch Retina MacBook Pro connect the15 - inch Retina MacBook Pro , which was released in June . The 15 - inch framework get down at $ 2199 with a 2.3GHz quadriceps - core Core i7 processor , 8 GB of RAM , 256 GB of blink of an eye memory board , and a 15.4 - inch display with a 2560 by 1600 resolution . The 15 - inch poser also include discerning nVidia GeForce GT 650 M graphics with 1 GB of dedicated video computer storage , as well as integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 . The $ 2799 15 - in Retina MacBook Pro hasthe same amount of RAM and the same graphics , but witha 2.6GHz space - magnetic core Core i7 mainframe and 512 GB of flash storage .
When liken performance between these three Retina MacBook Pros , the benefit of space - core processors is pronto apparent . With a Speedmark 8 score of 257 , the $ 2199 15 - inch Retina MacBook Pro was 40 percentage quicker overall than the 13 - inch Retina MacBook Pro . MathematicaMark was 78 percent quicker , and the Cinebench CPU test took one-half as foresightful to lead on the 15 - inch 2.3GHz space - burden Core i7 laptop than on the 13 - inch 2.5GHz dual - core Core i5 framework . The 15 - column inch model ’s discerning graphics help those laptops do more than doubly as degraded in our Portal 2 and Cinebench OpenGL test . Storage related mental test answer were very similar .
The results from the $ 2799 15 - inch Retina 2.6GHz quad - core Core i7 MacBook Pro were even more impressive . With an overall Speedmark 8 musical score of 275 , the 15 - inch Retina laptop computer was most 50 per centum faster than the 13 - inch Retina laptop computer , sum up a few systema skeletale per second to the artwork tests as well as improving each test incrementally .
Retina MacBook Pro vs. MacBook Air
With its size , weight and price , it ’s worth compare the fresh 13 - inch Retina MacBook Pro to a 13 - inch MacBook Air . A 13 - inch Air with a 1.8GHz three-fold - core Core i5 processor , 4 GB of RAM , 128 GB of flash storage , and integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 costs $ 1199 and weigh 0.61 pounds less than the 13 - inch Retina MacBook Pro .
The 13 - inch Retina MacBook Pro was 11 per centum quicker overall . Copy File tests , iPhoto import , Cinebench OpenGL and Portal 2 frame rate were very tight , while MathematicaMark was 7 percent faster on the Retina laptop and filecompressionwas 9 percent faster .
Check back shortly for the full review of the 13 - in Retina MacBook Pros , including assault and battery test . We ’ll also post performance consequence for the new Mac minis as soon as we receive and test them .
13-inch Retina MacBook Pro: Individual application scores
Results are in seconds . Lower results are good . Best result inbold . Reference models initalics .
effect are in seconds . Lower results are better . good solution inbold . Reference models initalics .
iTunes and Cinebench central processor solution are in second gear , ( blue results are better).VMware PCMark andMathematicaMark 8 are slews ( high results are dependable ) . good result inbold . character reference poser initalics .
13-inch Retina MacBook Pro: Graphics tests
resultant are in frames per secondly . HIgher results are better . good result inbold . Reference model initalics .
