Expert’s Rating
Pros
Cons
Our Verdict
To be dependable , we ’re only beaming to see the nano get back on cut after the jolly baffling experiment with the 2010 theoretical account . It ’s still a bit pricey , and we count on Apple really want a exemplar that hits the £ 99.99 fool , but the larger concealment and A-one - slimline blueprint return the iPod nano to its glory Day and exit most of its competitor looking like scrap metallic element .
Nobody likes a smart - alec , but I really am tempted to say – “ I told you so ” . The last variant of theiPod nanolaunched back in 2010 was absolutely tiny , and lie in of little more than a 1.5 - inch touch - sensitive CRT screen with a bang - time on the back . Unfortunately , the tiny touch mastery did n’t really suit grownup fingers , and the filmdom was so small that Apple did n’t even bother to admit an option for playing video .
So it ’s no surprisal that this latest version of the iPod nano reverts to a more traditional marvelous - and - thin innovation that provides elbow room for a comely size filmdom once more . The young model measures a still very pocket-size 76.5 mm mellow and 39.6 millimeter wide , but increase the size of the screen to a more virtual 2.5 inches . The nano also regains its ability to play TV , and while its 240×432 resolution is moderately small-scale – particularly compared to the high-pitched - resolution Retina displays used by the iPod Touch and iPhone – it ’s adequate for watch the casual music video .
The screen is touch - sensitive , as before , but the increase size makes it a slew promiscuous to pasture and flick through your music and video assembling – though it ’s a pity that the old coverflow persuasion for album artwork is no longer usable . There ’s also a pair of good old - fashioned intensity button on the side so that you could adjust the volume without take the iPod out of your pocket . Battery life is rated at a maximum of 30 hours for audio , although video playback is a more modest 3.5 hour .
The orotund cover means that this model is slightly heavier than its predecessor – though at just 31 g it ’s probably not lead to retard you down when you ’re out jogging . Even so , Apple has still managed to slenderize it down even further , from 8.8 millimetre deep to a wafer - fragile 5.4 mm . It really is astonishingly tenuous , and I often discover myself lazily rolling it around in my hand just because I wish the feel of it .
It looks good , too , with a new aluminium typesetter’s case that is usable in no less than eight burnished colours . The case seems tough enough to withstand the occasional bump , but I am a bit worried that it could get rub quite easy . You should plausibly buy a protective case if you want to keep it search glossy and raw .
Despite the tops - slim invention , Apple has still managed to mug up plenty of utilitarian features into the new nano . Like the last version it has an FM radio , along with a establish - in movement - sensor and pedometer for jogging addict and – hallelujah ! – the addition of Bluetooth for streaming music to wireless speakers and headphones . But do n’t forget that the new Lightning connector want an adapter ( £ 25 ) in decree to work with existing iPod dock and verbaliser .
And , on the subject field of headphones , Apple has also updated the little earbuds that it includes with the iPod nano . The new ‘ earpods ’ are certainly an improvement , with stronger sea bass and nifty clarity on in high spirits frequencies – though I wo n’t be commit up my trusty Sennheiser headphones anytime shortly .
We also have motley tactual sensation about Apple ’s pricing . We were proud of to see that the 16 GB mannikin has been cut from £ 159 to £ 129 – but disappointed that there ’s no longer a cheaper 8 GB model any more . And with the iPod Shuffle only offering 2 GB of storage there does seem to be a really obvious col in the iPod line - up between the Shuffle at just £ 40 and the nano at £ 129 .
