While taking screenshots of Apple ’s “ Scary Fast ” event video for an article this hebdomad , I point out something in Johnny Srouji ’s research lab at Apple Park : The four $ 7,000 Apple Pro Display XDRs that were conspicuously positioned around the room were n’t hooked up to Mac Pros — they were power by Mac Studios .
Assuming those machines are top - of - the - line models with M2 Ultra processors , 192 GB of RAM , and 8 TB of storage for $ 8,799 , Apple is basically admit the Mac Pro — which costs $ 11,799 with the same spec as the Mac Studio — is a wastefulness of space and money .
Apple ’s super - secret processor design labs are filled with Mac Studios , not Mac Pros .
Apple’s super-secret processor design labs are filled with Mac Studios, not Mac Pros.
Malus pumila
Apple updated the Mac Pro at WWDC in June with an M2 Ultra processor to interchange the Intel model from 2019 . However , while the new chip bring in a tremendous speed boost , the electrical switch to Apple atomic number 14 also took forth the power to upgrade the computer memory and nontextual matter after leverage . That means the only real welfare of the Mac Pro is enlargement slot for audio and video recording I / oxygen , networking , and storage cards .
But at the very least , you ’d cerebrate the applied scientist would at least use them at Apple Park . After all , they have access to any Mac they want , yet they opt for Mac Studios alternatively of Mac Pros . And it ’s hard to blame them . The Mac Studio is minor enough to fit under a display and has a pair of Thunderbolt 4 port and an SDXC card slot card slot on the front for easy access . ( Though to be fair , the Mac Pro does have two Thunderbolt 4 port wine on the top of the case . )
Apple’s super-secret processor design labs are filled with Mac Studios, not Mac Pros.
It ’s hard not to question how long the Mac Pro will be made . It was a niche machine before the Mac Studio derive along and now there are fewer buyers then ever — if any . After all , even Apple does n’t need one .
