Awise green puppetonce contended that “ sizing matters not . ” Obviously , he never had to fight with navigating Apple ’s product lineup .
Recent reports suggest that the Cupertino - based company might before long be releasing aMacBook Air with a larger 15 - inch screen . Strategically , that make a lot of sense : the MacBook Air is Apple ’s best - sell Mac , and for it to only be available in a single size is a missed opportunity . Yes , there are upsell chance for those who want a larger exhibit above all else , but given that presently entails a start all the way from $ 1,200 to $ 2,000 , many customers wo n’t take the bound – especially if they do n’t require the magnate or performance of a MacBook Pro .
Screen size has proven to be a cardinal discriminator in many of Apple ’s other production lines , and even the MacBook Air was available in multiple sizes in its past incarnation . But I say why stop there ? There are plenty of other Apple production where another screen sizing might make a big ( or minuscule ) difference of opinion .
Lighter than Air
Let ’s start with that same MacBook Air line . Once upon a clip , Apple offered its light notebook in two sizes : the 13 - inch it sells today and a lowly 11 - inch model . Alas , only the good die immature , and the 11 - column inch air travel was discontinued in 2019 , the same year that Apple discontinued itsothersmall laptop computer ( and putative Air replacement ) , the 12 - inch MacBook .
The 11 - column inch MacBook Air was a really good laptop for use of goods and services on an aeroplane .
metalworks
Nowadays , the smallest Mac laptop you could get is that 13 - column inch strain , and while it ’s shrunk down to be a bit closer to the 11 - inch in many dimension , it ’s still with child and lumbering than both of those discontinued models . That ’s a ignominy because a small , light laptop computer has a lot going for it .
As the proprietor of a 13 - inch M1 Air who previously add together around two consecutive 11 - inch Air models , I neglect the compact size of it of the pocket-sized laptop computer . It was easy to slip into a belittled bag , worked amazingly well in the confines of an airplane tray tabular array ( a place even the 13 - in line struggles with ) , and weighed in at almost half a pound less than the present M2 Air , for which my back thanked me . ( The 12 - inch MacBook , meanwhile , was just over two pound ! ) With the vantage that Apple atomic number 14 has bring to the company ’s current Macs , it would be truly telling to see what it could do for a smaller , lighter notebook .
Go big or go home
Apple ’s iMac has been the company ’s standard pallbearer for 25 years as of this August , and the latest M1 revision is nothing to sneeze at : with its Apple silicon internals , a sleek novel mannequin factor , and a full stove of throwback colors , it remain a solid entering in the background marketplace .
But as with the MacBook , the iMac line has digest from some casualty along the means , notably in the late Apple atomic number 14 transition . Rather than offer both 21.5 - in and 27 - inch versions , as it once did , the iMac has been consolidated into a undivided 24 - inch exemplar .
permit ’s hope the 27 - column inch iMac is reborn rather than later .
IDG
Unfortunately , this is another place where Apple ’s somewhat despotic insistence on a one - size of it - fits - all approachdoesn’tfit all . There ’s a reason Apple is consider a 15 - column inch MacBook Air , after all : sometimes people just desire a large screen door . They require to have more window open , or work with large images , or be capable to put two documents next to each other . presently , the only recourse on the background is to buy a standalone Mac desktop like a mini or a Mac Studio and pair it with an international display — and if you choose Apple ’s Studio Display to get the same great 5 K panel as the quondam 27 - inch iMac , it ’s not only not brassy , but it miss the elegance of the iMac ’s all - in - one package .
Rumor has itthe 27 - inch iMacmight return at some indefinite full stop in the future tense , but it ’s far from certain . Hey , if the HomePod can make a rejoinder , anything can .
Small change
Of all my screen size arguments , this last one will credibly be the most disputative : Apple should make a smaller iPhone .
Okay , wait , wait , I recognise what you ’re going to say : up until last class ’s iPhone 14 telephone circuit , Appledidmake a small iPhone , for at least a twosome of years . And clearly , if the iPhone 12 and 13 miniskirt manikin had been what the client wanted , then they would have bought more phones and Apple would n’t have discontinued the model , right ?
The iPhone 13 mini aspect to be the last mini manikin . countenance ’s desire it is n’t .
Well , perhaps . But I ’d argue the minis never got a sightly wag . For one thing , the mini models were part of the “ vanilla extract ” iPhone 12 and 13 lines , which meant some possible customers found themselves in the embarrassing position of having to prefer between a telephone that was summary and lightweight or one that had the good camera and most features .
So , my argument is that Apple should bring a smaller screen to the iPhoneProline . I know it ’s counterintuitive since the Pro line is the most expensive and it seems like a smaller phone should be cheaper , but every time I heave the volume of my iPhone 14 Pro and endeavor to stretch my finger’s breadth across the screen to tally the picture on the polar side , I wonder why I ’m doing this to myself . I would in spades pay for a small , lighter gimmick with all the features of the Pro - level phone .
great , simply put , is n’t always better , especially when it comes to a equipment you want to put in your pocket . Small and light can be a feature of speech , too .
