We ’re big fans of the newM2 MacBook Air . It ’s not a perfect laptop – we require a better webcam , it ’s a fingerprint magnet , and it ’s expensive – but we do think it ’s one of the best mundane laptops for routine user . When you grease one’s palms one , you havethreepower adaptor to choose from , depend on the model you select .
If you choose for the al-Qaeda model , it will admit a30W USB - C Power Adapterby nonpayment , but can pay an excess $ 20 to replace that with either thestandard 35W Dual USB - C PortorCompact Power Adapter , or the67W USB - C Power Adapter . When you buy a higher - death model with at least 512 GB of storage , you are given the 35W dual - port exemplar by default option , but can exchange to the 67W exclusive - porthole theoretical account at no monetary value .
Each has its professional and bunko , so we tested them all to help you settle which one to select .
If you want speed, you clearly want the 67W USB-C Power Adapter
Apple 13-inch MacBook Air (M2, 2022)
Power Adapter performance compared
To test the charging performance of these three power adaptor , we get hold of a sword new M2 MacBook Air and drained it down to 1 pct battery life , then used its include USB - nose candy to MagSafe line to attach it to one of the might adapters . We had no lotion running and kept the lid closed while institutionalise , open up it briefly every 10 second to enter the current land of charge before close it again .
This pass on us a look at the total boot performance over clock time for all three adapter , and the tarradiddle is interesting ( if not really surprising ) .
IDG
If you want speed, you clearly want the 67W USB-C Power Adapter
The charging rates for all adapters are limited as the laptop computer approaches a full charge – that ’s normal behavior for nigh all rechargeable batteries . The 67W USB - C Power Adapter is clearly the fastest , as one would expect .
What ’s that fourth line in gullible ? Since the 35W Dual USB - C Port Compact Power Adapter has two port , we want to find out how fast your MacBook Air will charge when both ports are in utilisation . So we charge an iPhone while charging the MacBook Air , and when that iPhone was closely fully charged we swap it out for another to keep a coherent load throughout our test . We ’ll canvas the results in detail below .
30W USB-C
There ’s a reason Apple gives you a plain 30W courser with the least expensive MacBook Air model , though at start price of $ 1,199 we think Apple should have just given all MacBook Air buyers the same choice ( 35W double - port or 67W single - port ) .
It ’s a little slower than the 35W arranger , as you might bear . You get to a half charge in just under an hour , about 10 minute longer than the 35W model . A full charge takes about 140 minute , 20 minute longer than the 35W role model . It ’s notbadperformance , but if you ’re already spending $ 1,199 for a laptop computer you should probably spend $ 20 more for one of the other two option .
30W USB-C Power Adapter
35W Dual USB-C Compact
This new transcriber has two things going for it . First , it ’s more heavyset than most of Apple ’s other charger . It does n’t stick as far out from the wall , and the embrasure aim downward , which is quite commodious . secondly , it ’s got two USB - C ports , so you’re able to charge two devices at a time with a single outlet .
Apple say the charging rates are independently controlled , so the 35W uttermost is divided up between the two embrasure based on motivation as negotiated by the USB Power Delivery 3.0 specification . Most of the time you ’ll get an even 17.5W split , but if you plug in something that requires less succus , such as an Apple Watch or AirPods , it will get 7.5W while the other embrasure gets up to 27.5W.
We tested this charger two ways : with only the MacBook Air plugged in and with the MacBook Air and an iPhone 13 stop up in . When the iPhone approached a full charge , we swapped it out for another to keep a relatively logical lading on that second port .
you’re able to see that charging two devices has the gestate dramatic impact on charge performance . With the whole king adapter to itself , the MacBook Air got to 60 percent in one hour , and a full kick in about two . When sharing with an iPhone , it only get one-half as much billing in that first hour and a full charge took about 75 percent longer .
That ’s the benefit of this intersection : tractableness . If you ’re not in a hurry , you could charge two devices in a couple hour with just a exclusive outlet . If you want to charge quicker , you’re able to just utilize one USB - C port . Third - party accessory makers have offered product like this for years , so it ’s decent to see Apple finally jump on the bandwagon .
Apple 35W Dual USB-C Port Compact Power Adapter
67W USB-C
If you want to fast - excite your MacBook Air , you ’ll need a ability adapter that delivers over 60 watts , such as Apple ’s 67W USB - C Power Adapter . Using it , we got to 52 percentage state of commission in 30 minutes , almost precisely matching Apple ’s 50 pct in half an hour hope . Given that you’re able to well get five or six hours of real employment done with half a charge , that ’s a really nice benefit .
The burster curve start up to slow down as the stamp battery gets full , of path . A full charge take just over an hour and a half , which is still quite sound pay that the barrage fire will easily last all day . This exponent adapter is a lot magnanimous and only has a undivided USB - C port , but it certainly is flying .
67W USB-C Power Adapter
Which is the best choice for you?
The 67W USB - C Power Adapter cost the same as the 35W Dual USB - C Compact theoretical account : $ 59 if purchased singly , or $ 20 more if you upgrade the base mannequin MacBoook Air . We think the $ 20 upgrade toll is probably worth it – the 30W adapter is slower , cock-a-hoop , and less flexible than the 35W model andmuchslower than the 67W model .
But the 35W Dual USB - C Port Power Adapter feels like the real success here . You ca n’t dissipated charge , but you have the flexibility to charge two gadget slow if you ’re not in a hurry or one gadget at a perfectly reasonable speed if not .
The 67W adapter is really only a anteriority for those who are often in billet where they involve to get a lot of succus quickly , and that ’s honestly not often a care with the amazing barrage living of the MacBook Air . But if you often find yourself with only 45 second to get as much charge as you could during a stopover between flight of stairs , thistle 67W transcriber might be the better choice .
If you want speed, you clearly want the 67W USB-C Power Adapter
Even so , we think there are better alternative . debate something like theAnker 735charger , which is about $ 60 like Apple ’s and has 65W of total index yield , but is humble and has two USB - snow ports and one USB - A port .
See our roundup of thebest MacBookchargers .
