AsApple reveal its newest iPadon Wednesday , a local house in China warned supplier and vendors in the country to stop sale of the tablet or face legal action , in what has become a het up battle over ownership of the iPad hallmark .

The trademark misdemeanor conflict also read a new good turn with creditor to the bankrupt Formosan display vendor , Proview , take that the iPad trademark is really under their ascendency , and could not have been sold by Proview to Apple .

In an overt alphabetic character on Wednesday , Proview claimed it had ownership of the iPad trademark in China . The sales , storing and shipment of the iPad , including Apple ’s young iPad , must quit because of unauthorized trademark function , the fellowship added .

The statement is the latest in a recollective personal credit line of amount Proview has taken to try and shun iPad sales event in China . The companionship , which acquired the trademark in 2001 , has also filed lawsuits and complaints requesting Chinese authorities to take action against the so-called hallmark infringement .

Apple has fought by taking Proview to homage . The U.S. tech giant contends the ship’s company bought the iPad trademark from Proview in late 2009 , and that Proview has not honored its agreement . To solve the dispute , a Taiwanese higher court is consider the pillow slip .

The outcome of the court ’s ruling may however not count . On Wednesday , a Chinese consultancy mathematical group said the iPad trademark is actually in the mitt of eight banks , which deal control of Proview ’s assets in March 2009 after the company suffer financial losings .

Hejun Vanguard Group , which represents the eight savings bank , said any negotiations to buy the trademark should have been done with the banks , and not Proview . “ Apple was to the full cognizant of this , ” Huang Yiding , frailty President of the United States of Hejun Vanguard Group , said in an interview . “ Apple is acting as if they were trick by Proview . ”

The banks , which include the state - own Bank of China , have the right to enforce with the country ’s hallmark function to quit the loss of the iPad trademark , Hejun Vanguard Group arrogate .

Apple could not be gain for prompt comment .

Proview owes the banks $ 180 million , harmonise to Huang . Last month , a Proview instance said Apple should devote $ 400 million to grease one’s palms the earmark . effectual experts have state Proview ’s tactics to ban the iPad in China are meant topressureApple to negotiate a closure .