Apple met with California ’s Department of Motor Vehicles in August to hash out ego - driving vehicles , which have in mind an Apple - branded electrical car might be tightlipped to reach the road than previously expected .

The Guardiancaught flatus of the meeting from DMV document , and confirm with the department ’s official that “ the Apple meeting was to review DMV ’s self-directed vehicle regulation . ”

The California DMV does n’t precisely have ego - driving cable car regulations , but it ’s work to constitute guidelines manufacturers to stick with before releasing their autonomous cars to the public . As you may reckon , a self - repel car needs to be strictly tested and undergo condom certifications before it strike the streets . According toThe Guardian , the California DMV miss its early 2015 deadline for muster in the regulations , but the section is issuing permission for a self - driving car test programme .

It ’s undecipherable whether Apple senior legal counsel Mike Maletic was discussing a permit request with DMV officials during the August 17 merging . Maletic met with DMV Deputy Director Bernard Soriano , Chief of Strategic Planning Stephanie Dougherty , and Chief Counsel Brian Soublet . If Apple does use for a license , all the details about its car ’s feature will become public knowledge . The Guardiannoted that Apple can keep its car under wraps by testing it on individual property , but that ’s not the same as a test on public roads in real condition . Apple had previouslyreached out to executives at GoMentum Station , a 2,100 - acre trial facility close to the public , but it ’s unclear if the ship’s company ever put its car to the test at that location .

The story behind the story : When rumors of an Apple car first emerged , it seemed like the company was in the very early stages of envisioning what its ego - drive vehicle would be like . But what if Apple has been working on a machine for year , and the intellect we ’re finally get wind about it is it ’s almost ready for the public to see ? Theevidenceismounting .