Apple and the iPhone are always in the news , but late , it seems like it ’s been for all the incorrect reasons . Over the past workweek or so , many stories have painted the iPhone as a security measures risk and Apple as sneakily throttling charging speeds . None of those things are materialise . Here ’s the true statement :
iOS 16 isn’t slowing down charging speeds
Apple introduced a new feature article in iOS 16.1 calledClean Energy Chargingthat seeks to confine the impact of your iPhone on the environs by “ selectively charging when humiliated carbon - emission electricity is usable . ” This feature has been enabled by default on all iOS 16 iPhones since October but a few people just discover it last calendar week and made a bunch of noise about it on Twitter . People lost their mind , calling the feature “ assuming and irritating , ” and loudly quetch about Apple’s“ESG [ environmental , social , and governing body ] bull 💩 . ”
Two thing are incorrect with the outrage . For one , the feature film should n’t affect your iPhone ’s charging habits . I ’ve left Clean Energy Charging on and have never had a trouble with my phone having less of a charge than expected . When I put it on the charger at night , it ’s satiate in the morning , and when I need a quick fill - up during the day , it takes just minutes . And since Clean Energy Charging does n’t touch on charging on the go , you ’ll never be pull up stakes in the lurch .
Secondly , you may turn it off very easily . Just because some people did n’t know about an optional lineament does n’t have in mind they can get disordered upon watch it exists — especially if they do n’t actually understand what it is . Apple turns Clean Energy Charging on by nonpayment because it ’s the variety of feature of speech that should gain everyone and upset no one , but apparently , that ’s not the grammatical case .
The iPhone passcode is on the spur of the moment public foe No . 1 .
metalworks
Your iPhone isn’t a sudden theft risk
The Wall Street Journalran an clause in belated February about a “ new ” tendency : a stealer befriends someone at a cake , watch over them long enough to see them typecast in their iPhone passcode , con the codification , steals the iPhone , changes the Apple ID word , and steals personal data and in some cases , financial report .
It ’s an alarming story for certain , but it ’s not a newfangled one . Most of the cases the Journal cites are from 2022 and the theft rings they write about have been operating for eld . But that did n’t stop countless other publications from confound aroundthe “ H ” wordand reporting on the story with headline like “ iPhone passcode scam ! Attackers can steal your money this style , ” “ This nasty iPhone passcode scam could be you thousands of dollars , ” and “ iPhone users issued pressing monition as thieves use ‘ reset ’ deception on smartphones and Apple is helpless once it ’s happened . ”
It all go very scary and serious , but it ’s still extremely rarefied . If anything , the news report highlight how secure the iPhone in reality is , since the crimes key a advanced ring of stealer , even if the offense itself is decidedly low - technical school . Maybe Apple should stop using your passcode as the security method for change your Apple ID word , but otherwise , there are plenty of strong protections built into the iPhone .
There isn’t a Face ID flaw
As if the fear and execrate about steal iPhones was n’t enough , a whole other solidifying of articles used The Wall Street Journal report to bring out imagine holes in Face ID , including WRDW ( “ Face I.D. might not be as safe as you think”),Local 3 News in Tennessee(“How thieves can steal your money using iPhone ’s Face ID feature article ” ) and even theNYC Office for the Prevention of Hate Crime , which advised iPhone users to disable Face ID when going out “ to protect your phone and data . ”
Is it potential for someone to slip your phone and “ scan your cheek without your consent and when you are not aware ” as one tale reported ? Sure . Is it likely to happen ? Not in the slight . Could the thief then determine up an Alternate Face ID so they can get back into the phone whenever they want ? Sure . Is it likely to bechance ? Not in the svelte .
There ’s nothing ill-timed with Face ID . It ’s the best biometric appraiser on a smartphone and no other phone comes close . Despite hear for years to replicate the TrueDepth photographic camera and scanning , the top Android phones are still using fingermark sensing element because Face ID is so modern . So the next prison term you go out with your iPhone in your pocket , the last thing you have to worry about is Face ID .
